True face of Sufism


DARGAH AJMER SHARIF

dr vivek arya

A. Conversion of Hindus by Sufis

Sufis are considered as  messengers of god who believed in peace, harmony and nonviolence. But contrary to this we read many evidences of Sufis using all measures to convert Hindus towards Islam. From debates, stipends, grants, higher official posts, life threat, pardoning of life to brutal killings were main tools for them.

1. Gisu Daraz famous Chisti Sufi (born 30 July 1321 in New Delhi) learnt Sanskrit and acquired a knowledge of the Hindu epics in an attempt to refute the religious beliefs in Hinduism. He indulged in debates with Brahmins on the condition that whoever was beaten should embrace the religion of the victor. Gisu Daraz claimed to have defeated many Brahman scholars.

(Ref. Gisu Daraz, jawanmi’u’l-kilam, British museum MS.or 252, ff.9a, 87a-90a)

2. Shahjahan ordered Mulla Muhibib “ali sindi, an alim, poet and Sufi whom he deeply respected to convert willing Hindus to Islam which would make them eligible for stipends and revenue grants”

(Ref. tabaqat-I-shahjahani, f.316b)

3. Sheikh dawud of chati converted fifty to a hundred Hindus each day would make the number of converts annually an impossible neat 15,000

(Ref. supra, p.63)

Sheikh dawud’s successor, shah abu’l-ma’ali, and Sufis in other qadiriyya khanqahs certainly never hesitated in their proselytizing mission and even Mulla shah converted a number of Hindus to Islam

(Ref. supra, p.119-120)

4. Shah ‘abdu’l-’aziz himself claimed to have converted hundreds of hindus, but was not successful in recruiting more than half a dozen shi’is to the ranks of sunnism.

(Ref.- malfuzat-I-shah ‘abdu’l-’aziz, p.22)5. A Hindu zamindar Birbar was arrested for fomenting a rebellion and was given the death sentence. He requested a Sufi Miran Bhikh to save his life and promising to become a Muslim if he did so. He was pardoned and was rewarded with a rode of honor. Sufi Miran converted him to Islam and also made him his disciple.

(Ref. HSI vol. 2 p.272-273)

5. According to Dara -Sukoh, Sheikh ‘Abdul-qadir converted a large number of Hindus to Islam, as well as causing many wayward Muslims to adopt a pious life

(Ref. Muhammad dara-shukoh, safinatu’l-auliya’, lucknow, 1872,p.69)

6. Sheikh Mahmud bin Abdullah gujrati was for several years deeply in love with the son of a Hindu dancer. The sheikh’s success in subsequently islamizing the boy was a matter of great satisfaction to the orthodox.

(Ref. Gulzar-i-abrar, f.247a.)

7. Nawahun, the Hindu darogha of Uch once visited Makhdum Jahaniyan (also known as Saiyid Jalalu’d-din Bukhari, eminent Suhrawardiyya Sufi) on his deathbed. He in his previous discourse had expressed that a formal recitation of kalima did not make the speaker a Muslim. The Saiyid concluded that Nawahun’s statement amounted to a protestation of faith. Nawahun was not willing to accept Islam. He even made an unsuccessful attempt to prevent his conversion from sultan of Delhi. But makhdum’s younger brother Saiyid Raju caught and executed him.

(Ref. HSI .by SAA Rizvi vol. 1 p. 279,280)

8. We know that the Suhrawardiyya, Shaikh lalalu’d-din tabrizi, Makhdum Jahaniyan and his brother, Raju Qattal, were active propagators of Islam. The Sufis trained in the khanqahs of Shaikh alaud-dala Simnani, Mir Saiyid Ali Hamadani and his son and successors, Mir Muhammad, considered the conversion of Hindus to Islam as one of their main objectives. Shaikh Jalal of Sylhet and his Turkistani disciples were similarly imbued with missionary fervour, as were Khwajgan and the Naqshbandiyyas of central Asia, some of whom would devote a few years of their lives fighting against the non-Islamic Turkic tribes before converting them to Islam. The Sufis of the Shattariyya, qadiriyya and the naqshbandiyyas orders who began establishing their khanqahs during the fifteenth century were deeply aware of the proselytizing traditions of their ancestors in Persia and central Asia, and brought their knowledge to bear upon Indian conditions in order to gain converts.

(Ref. HSI by SAA Rizvi, vol.2, pp.426)

PRIYANKA CHOPRA VISITING DARGAH

B. Influenced Muslim rulers to show hostile behaviors towards Hindus to enable them to denounce Hinduism and accept Islam.

1. Saiyid nur-ud-din Mubarak’s gave four principles for protection of Islam. He was a Suhrawardiyya khalifa appointed by Iltutmish and was called by people of the city as, Mir-I dilhi (lord of Delhi)

The first one is as follows:

They (rulers) should promote Islamic customs, promulgate the commands of the sharia, enforcing what is obtained and prohibiting what is forbidden by it, and uproot kufr (infidelity), shirk (polytheism) and idolatry. If they cannot fully uproot kufr and shirk they should make every effort to disgrace and humiliate Hindus, mushriks (polytheists) and idolaters, for they are inveterate enemies of god and the prophet Mohammad. They should not tolerate the sight of Hindus, and in particular they should exterminate the Brahmans, who are the leaders of heretics and disseminators of heresy. They should not allow kafirs (infidels) and mushriks to lead an honorable life or sassing to them high office.

(Ref. tarikh-I firuz shahi, pp. 41-44)

2. Shaikh Muzaffar (Firdawsiyya Sufi) reminded sultan of Bengal Ghiyasu’d-din Azam shah that high government posts should not be given to Hindus and wrote:

An infidel may be entrusted with some work but he should not be made wali (chief supervisor or governor) so that he may have control over and impose his authority on Muslims. God says “let not the believers take for friends or helpers unbelievers and neglect god: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from god expect by way of precaution, that ye may guard yourselves from them. There are severe warnings in the Quran, the Hadis and historical works against those who have given authority to the unbelievers over the believers. God grants opulence and provisions from unexpected sources, and he gives deliverance from them.” There is authoritative promise of provisions, victory and prosperity. The vanquished unbelievers with heads hanging downward, exercise their power and authority and administer the lands which belong to them. But they have also been appointed (executive) officers over the Muslims, in the lands of Islam, and they impose their orders on them. Such things should not happen.

(Ref. S.H.Askari- the correspondence of the fourteenth century Sufi saints of Bihar with the contemporary sovereigns of Delhi and Bengal, journal of the Bihar research society, march 1956,p.186-187)

3. Mir Saiyid Ali Hamadani (founder of Kubrawiyya Sufi order of Kashmir) emphasized a covenant to sultan of Kashmir on his relation with Hindus. Covenant is as follows:

1.      They (the hindus) will not bid new idol temples.

2.      They will not rebuild any existing temple which may have fallen into disrepair.

3.      Muslim travelers will not be prevented from staying in temples.

4.      Muslim travelers will be provided hospitality by Zimmis in their own houses for three days.

5.      Zimmis will neither act as spies nor give spies shelter in their houses.

6.      If any relation of a Zimmi is inclined towards Islam, he should not be prevented from doing so.

7.      Zimmis will respect Muslims.

8.      Zimmis will courteously receive a Muslim wishing to attend their meetings.

9.      Zimmis will not dress like Muslims.

10.  They will not take Muslim names.

11.  They will not ride horses with saddle and bridle.

12.  They will not possess swords, bows or arrows.

13.  They will not wear signet rings.

14.  They will not openly sell or drink intoxicating liquor.

15.  They will not abandon their traditional dress, which is a sign of their ignorance, in order that they may be distinguished from Muslims.

16.  They will not openly practice their traditional customs amongst Muslims.

17.  They will not build their houses in the neighbourhood of Muslims.

18.  They will not carry or bury their dead near Muslim graveyards.

19.  They will not mourn their dead loudly.

20.  They will not buy Muslim slaves.

(Ref. Zakhiratul-muluk, pp. 117-118)

(Saiyid Ali considered Hindus as Zimmis)

4. Shah Waliu’llah suggested Mughal emperor Ahmad shah regarding their administration:

Strict orders should be issued in all Islamic towns forbidding religious ceremonies, publicly practiced by infidels (such as the performance of Holi and ritual bathing in the ganges). On the tenth of Muharram Shi’is should not be allowed to go beyond the bounds of moderation, neither should they be rude nor repeat stupid things (that is, recite tabarra or condemn the first three successors of Muhammad) in the streets or bazaars.

(REF. Shah Waliu’llah dihlawi ke siyasi maktubat, aligarh, 1950, pp. 41-44, 2nd edition, Delhi 1969, p.5)

5. Under the influence of Mir (Mir Muhammad Sufi of Kubrawiyya order) and Suha Bhatta, the sultan’s  (Sultan Sikander of Kashmir 1389-1413) policy changed. Ancient temples in Pompur, Vijabror, Martand, Anantnag, Sopur and Baramula were desecrated and demolished; many puritanical and discriminatory laws were introduced and the jiziya or poll tax was imposed on hindus for the first time in Kashmir. The persecution of Brahmans, their exclusion from the top spheres of government and the ensuing replacement by Irani migrants, gave the administration a veneer of orthodoxy.

(Ref. HSI by SAA Rizvi, vol.1, pp.297)

SHILPA SHETTY , RAJ KUNDRA VISITING DARGAH

C. Sufis promoted or participated in destruction of Hindu temples.

1.Miyan Bayan supported Bahadur Shah of gujrat to invade Rajputs and destruct Hindu temple.

In Ajmer, there lived Bayan Majzub who spent most of his time in the vicinity of the tomb of Khwaja Mu’inu’d-din Chisti. It is said that before his accession to the throne, Bahadur shah of gujrat (1526-1537) visited Ajmer, which was then ruled by the Rajputs who had gone to the extent of converting the tomb into an idol temple. Bahadur took a vow that if he were to succeed to the throne; he would take revenge upon the infidels and reduce them to miserable circumstances. Miyan Bayan who was present at the time instantly ordered his slave girl to arrange for a high throne for the sea bird, meaning Bahadur. The prince’s claim to the gujrati throne were strongly contested by his rivals. However, considering bayan’s symbolic gesture as a prophecy of his success in acceding to the gujrat sultanate, he immediately returned to gujrati and soon became its ruler. Shortly he invaded the Rajputs and shattered their power.

(Ref. akhbaru’l-akhyar by Shaikh ‘abdu’l-haqq muhaddis dihlawi pp.291-292)

2. Shaikh Jalalu’d-din of Suhrawardiyya Sufi order demolished temple and constructed a khanqah in place of it.

Shaikh Jalalu’d-din had many disciples in Bengal. He first lived at lakhnauti, constructed a khanqah and attached a langer to it. He also bought some gardens and land to be attached to the monstry. He moved to Devatalla (Deva Mahal) near Pandua in northern Bengal. There a kafir (either a Hindu or a Buddhist) had erected a large temple and a well. The Shaikh demolished the temple and constructed a takiya (khanqah) and converted a large number of kafirs.

(Ref. jamali, p.171)

DEG FILLED WITH HINDU MONEY

D. Sufis appealed or helped Muslim invaders to invade Hindu kings

1.Shaikh Nur Qutb-i ‘ Alam and Saiyid Muhammad Ashraf Jahangir Simnani appealed Sultan Ibrahim Shah Sharqi to invade Bengal.

Shaikh Nur Qutb-i ‘ Alam believed in the traditional perso-islamic theory of kingship and taught his followers tom obey the sultan according to the prophet’s Hadis and the advice of leading Chisti saints. His relations with Sikander’s successor, Ghiyasu’d-din A’zam Shah, were cordial but he was distressed by the growing factionalism at court. A powerful party of Hindus and Muslims, led by Raja Ganesha, a local Hindu chief of Dinajpur in North Bengal began to dominate the government. After the death of Ghiyasu’d-din A’zam Shah, between 1410 and 1415, the Raja acted as king- maker and one after the other three puppets were elevated to the throne. During the reign of the last, Ala’u’d-Din Firuz Shah, Raja Ganesha was defacto ruler of Bengal. This prompted Nur Qutb-i ‘ Alam to write to Sultan Ibrahim Shah Sharqi of Jaunpur urging him to invade Bengal and in so doing restore the glory of Islam. Saiyid Muhammad Ashraf Jahangir Simnani also wrote a similar letter. In 1415 Sultan Ibrahim Shah Sharqi invaded Bengal but a peace was concluded in which Ganesha promised his son would convert to Islam before assuming the throne of Bengal.

(Ref. tabaqat-I-akbari, 3,p.265; gulshan-I ibrahimi, pp. 296-207; ghulam hussain salim, riyazu’s- salatin, Calcutta, 1890, pp.108-110, maktubat-I ashrafi (letter to sultan Ibrahim); mir’atu’l-asrar, ff.477b-79b; riyazu’s-salatin, pp.112-113)

2. Sheikh Ghaus of Shattariyya order of Sufis helped Babur to seize Gwalior fort.

For thirteen years and four months Shaikh Ghaus performed rigorous ascetic exercises in the caves of Chunar, near the Ganges in the modern district of Mirzapur in the U.P., and became known to the Muslim elite for his miraculous powers. He settled in Gwalior where he became very influential. In November 1526 he helped Babur’s army to seize the Gwalior fort, thereby winning the respect and confidence of the emperor.

(Ref. Beveridge, a.s.tr.Babur-nama, 2, reprint, New Delhi, 1970, pp. 539-540)

3. Saiyid Ahmad Shahid urged Muslims to help him in annihilation of Sikhs from northern India.

11 January 1827 he (Saiyid Ahmad Shahid) officiated at a ceremony of bay’a in which several thousand theologians, Sufis, leading citizens and common people in the northwest frontier pledged him their allegiance, after which they recited the khutba in his name. At the time Saiyid protested that as an Imam he was not commissioned to deprive the various sultans between Kabul and Bukhara of their states. They could continue to flourish in peace, he said, and would assert only his leadership in the question of bid’a (sinful innovations). However they were urged to offer him their military assistance in a jihad against the Sikhs.

(Ref. Muhammad ja’far thaneswari, ed. Maktubat-Saiyid Ahmad shahid, Karachi, 1969.no.14, 16)

E. Sufis unfriendly attitude towards Hindus

1.Shah waliu’llah advised Indian Muslims to live so far from Hindu towns that they would be unable to see the light from the fires in Hindu houses.

(Ref. shah waliu’llah, hujjat Allah al – baligha, 1, Karachi, n.d. pp.468)

2. He (Makhdum Jahaniyan or Saiyid Jalalu’d-din Bukhari of Suhrawardiyya order) also sternly disapproved of giving Allah such Hindi names as Thakur (lord), Dhani (rich) and Kartar (creator)

(Ref. siraju’l-hidaya, f.64b)

Sufis praised Muslim invaders who killed millions of Hindus, plundered thousands of temples, raped countless mothers and sisters and sold Hindus in slave market of Kabul.

It is not surprising that Shah Waliu’llah considered sultan Mahmud of Ghazna (998-1030) Islam’s greatest ruler as he launched and sustained the first read conquest of northern India. His fame had a natural qualification- Mahmud was the greatest ruler after the khilafat-I-khass. Shah waliu’llah argued that in reference to Mahmud historians failed to recognize that his horoscope had been identical to the prophet’s and that this fact had enabled him to obtain significant victories in wars to propagate Islam.

(Ref. shah waliu’llah, qurrat al-a’ynain fi tafzil al-shaykhyn, Delhi, 1893, p.324.)

Sufis didn’t hesitate to say lie for personal benefits

When mughal emperor aurangzib imprisoned his own son Shah Alam, his other son prince Azam shah believed that if Shah Alam were killed his accession to the throne would not prove too difficult. So Azam shah started hatching plots, using a Shaikh from Sirhind to whom the emperor was greatly attached. Azam deposited with a banker 900,000 rupees in name of the Sirhind Shaikh, on the condition that the latter incite the emperor to execute Shah Alam. The Shaikh informed the emperor that Shah Alam was an evil man who should receive the death penalty and that such knowledge had been given to him by the prophet. Owing to the seriousness of this accusation the emperor requested the Shaikh to mystically consult the prophet again, only to be told that the orders were final. The following morning the Shaikh called on the emperor, urging him against a delay in carrying out the express command of the prophet. Aurangzib summoned Sidi Faulad the kotwal, to whom he delegated complete responsibility in the handling of the matter. Sidi Faulad summoned every prominent banker in the imperial camp with their diaries and account books. The note about the plot hatched by Azam shah was found.

(Ref. HSI by SAA Rizvi, vol.2, pp.370-371)

NOW WITH THE ABOVE REFERENCES AND FACTS ITS VERY CLEAR THAT SUFIS ONLY MOTIVE WAS TO CONVERT HINDUS TO ISLAM AS FOR THEM HINDUS ARE KAFIRS.ITS MASS MEDIA WHICH IS PROJECTING IMAGE OF SUFIS AS SECULAR BUT TRUTH IS TOTALLY OPPOSITE TO IT.

Advertisements

About Fan of Agniveer

I am a fan of Agniveer

Posted on October 7, 2011, in Islam. Bookmark the permalink. 18 Comments.

  1. Same as Shaj Jalal as his 360 thungs of Shylet Bangladesh

  2. Dr Arya, thanks for your research into this matter.

    All knowledgable people know the tribal nature of Abrahimic religions.

    These are godless people. Their only goal in life is wealth and fame. They have no morals and no shame.

    The Arya Samaj must work aggressively in uniting Hindus. If Hindus are united, the issue of conversion will go away.

    Arya Samaj must start a war to bring Dalits into its fold. It is a difficult task but not impossible. The Pundits have alienated a large part of Hindus from the mainstream. This has made Hindus an easy target of both Muslims and Christians.

    I see a drift in Arya Samaj towards idol worship and away from Swami Dayanand. This drift has to be arrested.

    I can suggest a number of ways Dalits can be brought in the fold.

    Thanks.

    Arya Garg.

  3. Islam is a religion of peace

    Dear Team Agniveer !
    Thanx for the info !
    At last u agree that Islam was not spread in Inda with swords but with dialogues when even Hindu scholar couldnot defend their religion & scriptures near the likes of Gisu Daraz!

  4. mr Islam through this article i had proved that sufis were spy of muslim invaders who even converted your ancestors hindus to islam by hook or crook. if gisu daraj was able to win one or two muslims then even worst is that even after learning sanskrit he remain unaware of true knowledge of vedas.

    • Islam is a religion of peace

      Dear Agniveer
      The 1st part shows that Islamic Scholars defeated Pundits on open debates & when saw the light of Islam & accepted Islam (truth)
      And their followers accepted Islam after their Guru !

  5. mr islam first of i am fan of agniveer not agniveer. second there are many examples of muslims converting to hinduism. its strange to know that in whole article you find only one comment of gisu and nothing else.if he was able to convert one or two then also it proves my stand that sufis main motive was to convert hindus.

  6. Islam is a religion of peace

    No comment till now…..

  7. Dr Saradindu Mukherji

    Good job done. Pl keep it up

  8. Sufism was one of the ways of converting Non muslims to muslims, although many sects of islam don’t think sufism as Islam. Compared to hardcore islam which follows strict implementation of its rules, Sufism is more tolerant. We also have to agree on the point that , that was the time when Hinduism has many social restrictions and dogmas at that time which was discriminatory by birth.

  9. Narain Kataria in New York

    In its issue of July, 2012, India Perspectives, a Government of India publication has portrayed Amir Khusrau (1253-1325), a Sufi poet, favorite of Delhi Sultans, with a good paint and thereby mischievously tried to spread untruth, falsify Indian History and glorify Islam.

    The writer of this article seems to be inoculated against logic and truth.

    The fact of the matter is that Amir Khusrau like other Sufis was working in tandem with Jihadist rulers of the time. There was a tacit understanding between fanatic Sultans and the so called Sufi saints to convert Hindus to Islam and Islamize Hindu India into Dar-al-Islam (Islamic nation). Both of them were hand in gloves. Both were playing the role of the good cop and the bad cop to hoodwink victims of Jihad (Hindus and Sikhs) in India.

    While the Sultans were using rape, murder, loot and destruction of Hindu temples as a weapon to terrorize Hindus, the Sufis were playing the perfidious role of saviors of persecuted Hindus. They were preaching Islam under the garb of Vedantic philosophy. This strategy is part of Al Taqiyya, an Islamic doctrine which mandates Muslims to use treachery and deception in furtherance of Islam. They were using sophistry and subterfuge to convert naïve and gullible Hindus to Islam while hiding their diabolical design to establish Nizam-e-Mustafa (Rule of Allah).

    Amir Khusrau was an ardent Muslim having absolute faith in the Prophet, Quran and Shariah. He adhered strictly to the basic tenets and frame work of Islam, which, of course, held proselytization a very “meritorious” and “pious” work.

    Amir Khusrau had vehement aversion and abhorrence against Hindus. Whenever a Hindu was crushed to bits under the feet of the elephants of Islamic army, he felt great satisfaction.

    Khusrau writes that under Jalaluddin Khilji (1290-96), “whenever a living Hindu fell into the hands of the victorious king he was pounded to bits under the feet of the elephants…” [Ref: KS Lal; Legacy of Muslim Rule in India, p-120]

    Amir Khusrau was a fanatic Islamist. He was so contemptuous of Hindus that he described murderers of Hindus as holy warriors:

    “The whole country by means of swords of our holy warriors has become like a forest denuded of its thorns by fire. With the stroke of our swords Hindu infidels have been vaporized. The strong men of the Hindus have been trodden under feet. Islam is triumphant, idolatry subdued.” Tarikh-i-Alai: (Eliot & Dowson. Vol. III)

    Amir Khusrau considered India as a land of infidels (Kafirs) and impure. He expressed jubilation when the Somnath Temple was destroyed by Sultan Allauddin Khilji.

    “The tongue of the sword of the Khalifa of the time, which is the tongue of the flame of Islam, has imparted light to the entire darkness of Hindustan by the illumination of guidance…. On the other side, so much dust arose from the battered temple of Somnath, that even the sea was not able to lay it; and on the right hand and on the left hand the army has conquered from sea to sea and several capitals of the gods of the Hindus, in which Satanism has prevailed since the time of the Jinns, have been demolished. All the impurities of infidelity have been cleansed by the Sultan’s destruction of the idol-temples, beginning with his first holy expedition against Devagiri. (Tarikh-i-Alai of Amir Khusrau: Eliot & Dawson Vol-iii, p. 85.)

    It is worth noting that most of the so called Sufi-saints had come to India along with Islamic invaders. They were the missionaries of Islam – a Trojan horse in the canonical version. They worked as fifth columnists for the Muslim invaders and carried on espionage work on their behalf. They were in India to implement an ingeniously designed ghoulish strategy.

    I consider Sufi-saint as the most dangerous group of people. They have done more harm to Hindus and Hindustan than their fanatic masters. For example, Khwaja Muinddin Chisti of Ajmer Sharif had the honor of converting 9 million Hindus to Islam. (Urdu Newspaper Pak Express, New York dated May 14, 2012). He had invited Mohammad Gori to attack India and expressed joy when the Hindu King Prithviraj Chauhan was defeated by Muslims.

    In the backdrop of what has been stated above, it is incumbent on the Ministry of External Affairs to verify the authenticity of the material before publishing it in India Perspectives.

    • safron terrorist

      If u believe on such stupid article then u have to belive on this story as well, u know lord ram & sita was brother & sister please do ur research,………

  10. May more and more Hindus embrace Islam through the Light brought to them by the Sufis! You are lucky we are here, to bring you out of the dark.

  11. रामायण में सभी राक्षसों का
    वध हुआ था।
    लेकिन💥 सूर्पनखा का वध
    नहीं हुआ था
    उसकी नाक और कान काट
    कर छोड़ दिया गया था ।
    वह कपडे से अपने चेहरे को छुपा कर
    रहती थी ।

    रावन के मर जाने के बाद वह
    अपने पति के साथ शुक्राचार्य
    के पास
    गयी और जंगल में उनके आश्रम में रहने लगी ।

    राक्षसों का वंश ख़त्म न
    हो
    इसलिए, शुक्राचार्य ने शिव
    जी की आराधना की ।

    शिव जी ने
    अपना स्वरुप शिवलिंग
    शुक्राचार्य को दे कर कहा की जिस दिन
    कोई “वैष्णव” इस पर
    गंगा जल चढ़ा देगा उस दिन
    राक्षसों का नाश हो जायेगा ।

    उस आत्म लिंग को शुक्राचार्य
    ने वैष्णव मतलब हिन्दुओं
    से दूर रेगिस्तान में स्थापित
    किया

    जो आज अरब में
    “मक्का मदीना” में है ।
    सूर्पनखा जो उस समय चेहरा
    ढक कर रखती थी वो परंपरा
    को उसके बच्चो ने पूरा
    निभाया ओर आज भी
    मुस्लिम औरतें चेहरा ढकी
    रहती हैं।

    सूर्पनखा के वंसज
    आज मुसलमान कहलाते हैं ।
    क्यूँकी शुक्राचार्य ने इनको
    जीवन दान
    दिया , इस लिए ये शुक्रवार
    को विशेष
    महत्त्व देते हैं ।

    पूरी जानकारी तथ्यों पर आधारित सच है।⛳

    जानिए इस्लाम कैसे पैदा हुआ..

    👉असल में इस्लाम कोई धर्म नहीं है .एक मजहब है..
    दिनचर्या है..

    👉मजहब का मतलब अपन
    े कबीलों के गिरोह को बढ़ाना..

    👉यह बात सब जानते है की मोहम्मदी मूलरूप से अरब
    वासी है ।

    👉अरब देशो में सिर्फ रेगिस्तान पाया जाता है.वहां जंगल नहीं है,
    पेड़ नहीं है. इसीलिए वहां
    मरने के बाद जलाने
    के लिए लकड़ी न होने के
    कारण ज़मीन में दफ़न कर
    दिया जाता था.

    👉रेगिस्तान में हरीयाली
    नहीं होती.. ऐसे में रेगिस्तान
    में हरा चटक रंग देखकर
    इंसान चला आता की यहाँ
    जीवन है ओर ये हरा रंग
    सूचक का काम करता था..

    👉अरब देशो में लोग
    रेगिस्तान में तेज़ धुप में
    सफ़र करते थे, इसीलिए
    वहां के लोग सिर को
    ढकने के लिए
    टोपी 💂पहनते थे।
    जिससे की लोग बीमार न पड़े.

    👉अब रेगिस्तान में खेत
    तो नहीं थे, न फल, तो
    खाने के लिए वहा अनाज
    नहीं होता था. इसीलिए वहा
    के
    लोग 🐑🐃🐄🐐🐖जानवरों
    को काट कर खाते थे. और अपनी भूख मिटाने के लिए
    इसे क़ुर्बानी का नाम दिया
    गया।

    👉रेगिस्तान में पानी की
    बहुत कमी रहती थी,💧
    इसीलिए लिंग (मुत्रमार्ग)
    साफ़ करने में पानी बर्बाद
    न हो जाये इसीलिए लो
    ग खतना
    (अगला हिस्सा काट देना ) कराते
    थे।

    👉सब लोग एक ही कबिल
    े के खानाबदोश होते थे
    इसलिए
    आपस में भाई बहन ही
    निकाह कर लेते थे।

    👉रेगिस्तान में मिट्टी
    मिलती नहीं थी मुर्ती बनाने
    को इसलिए मुर्ती पुजा नहीं
    करते थे| खानाबदोश थे ,

    👉 एक जगह से दुसरी जगह
    ाना पड़ता था इसलिए
    कम बर्तन रखते थे और एक थाली नें पांच लोग खाते थे|

    👉कबीले की अधिक से
    अधिक संख्या बढ़े इसलिए
    हर एक
    को चार बीवी रखने
    की इज़ाजत दी जाती थी
    ..
    🔥अब समझे इस्लाम
    कोई धर्म नहीं मात्र एक कबीला है..
    और इसके नियम असल में इनकी दिनचर्या है ।

    नोट : पोस्ट पढ़के इसके
    बारे में सोचो।

    #इस्लाम_की_सच्चाई

    अगर हर हिँदू माँ-बाप अपने बच्चों को बताए कि
    अजमेर दरगाह वाल
    े ख्वाजा मोईनुद्दीन चिश्ती
    ने किस तरह इस्लाम कबूल ना करने पर पृथ्वीराज चौहान की पत्नी संयोगिता को मुस्लिम सैनिकों के
    बीच बलात्कार करने के लिए निर्वस्त्र करके फेँक दिया था ।

    और फिर किस तरह
    पृथ्वीराज चौहान की वीर
    पुत्रियों ने आत्मघाती बनकर मोइनुद्दीन चिश्ती को
    72 हूरों के पास भेजा
    था ।
    तो शायद ही कोई हिँदू उस मुल्ले की कब्र पर माथा पटकने जाए

    “अजमेर के ख्वाजा
    मुइनुद्दीन चिश्ती को ९०
    लाख हिंदुओं को इस्लाम
    में लाने का गौरव प्राप्त
    है ।
    मोइनुद्दीन चिश्ती ने ही मोहम्मद गोरी को भारत लूटने के लिए उकसाया और आमंत्रित किया था…

    (सन्दर्भ – उर्दू अखबार
    “पाक एक्सप्रेस, न्यूयार्क
    १४ मई
    २०१२).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: